Merged
Conversation
Problem: - The standard does not provide a function object that calls unary `operator+`. This can be useful for conventional conversions, for example an overloaded `operator+` that converts an scoped enumeration to its underlying type. Solution: - Add `unary_plus` for this purpose. - `unary_plus<void>` deduces its argument and provides `is_transparent` in accordance with standard practice.
mjcaisse-intel
approved these changes
Jan 5, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem:
operator+. This can be useful for conventional conversions, for example an overloadedoperator+that converts an scoped enumeration to its underlying type.Solution:
unary_plusfor this purpose.unary_plus<void>deduces its argument and providesis_transparentin accordance with standard practice.